CYBER TORTURE EVERYDAY TO DISTROY A VICTIM AND WITNESSES JOY AND HAPPINESS AND PEACE OF MIND UNDER CONSTRUCTION

EMAIL TO COMCAST/XFINITY THEN FORWARDED TO THE FBI BECAUSE OF THE STAFFS ARROGANCE AT PIZZA MY HEART

I am being blocked from buying more time on your wifi service by the mexican pizza cooks at Pizza My Heart on Pacific Ave. in Santa Cruz Ca.

Each time I put in the correct user name and password ( witch was changed by a customer service rep to YYY and then changed to XXXX verifyed via cell phone. I was able to buy a week pass now when I try again I can't get passed the first screen, sometimes the enter your user name screen doesn't even come up. I have tried to contact you by phone and that is blocked too. My user name is [email protected] Please contact me at this email adress.

These types of blocks are put before me at every wifi ISP I try to use in Santa Cruz.  In real time Manfree's hacker employees " Mira, and Sam," from Lulu Carpenters come in with the Santa Cruz smirk, " we screw you and there is nothing you can do about it," on there faces.

Corporate America be advised if you are not a local company and your not associated with the mexican mafia, the Hells Angels, the Westside Gang, the Sterling gang of tradesmen and contractors or the street gang called the Family your business is in jeopardy in the Monterrey Bay, Silicon Valley, SF Bay region because of the power and influence of Organized Crime in this region.

These people are blocking your business in Santa Cruz Calif. too

( most are alumni or present students of UCSC the most corrupt University in America today, do not hire alumni or grads from UCSC, ( I guarantee they are in your service and customer service dept. ( if you doubt what I am documenting here, I am a former Corporate/ Industrial Security Consultant for ADT/Tyco in the Silicon Valley ) they well undermine your company from the inside out.

Be advised that I am trying to contact the FBI Cyber Crime Dev. and file a complaint with the FCC so I can file a law suit against these people for interfering with my use of the internet, blocking communication with a federal law enforcement agency and preventing me from building my websites schatemongers.com and ziggysurfcatz.com, and finishing my book Sodom and Gomorrah in America Today : The Power of the Underground Economy in the NorCal Region of America.

Please be advised this is what the mexicans are saying in realtime along with A manager and employees and the crazy Mexican pizza cooks: 

" its the devil " he thinks its the devil," " ha ha ha," " the mexicans control the internet," " your a rat," " we kill our rats," " the mexicans are in control here," " google won't let that get thru either," "+we do this because you insult our people," " we do this because you disrespect us,"" come," " go home," " your our biggest leak," " its Tim May," " its for UCSC," " we spent years building this hackers network," " its Cruzio," " this part is nuts," " ha ha ha," " move on man," " ha, ha, ha," " he thinks we poison him," "ha ha ha," " we have professional reputations to maintain," " ha ha ha," " you cant prove it," " your teeth are going to rot," " ha ha ha," " the police told us to leave him alone," "  ha ha ha," " we only let you get so far," " the mexicans let you see only what you want them to see," " they change the text to your book," " your website,"  "they don't want you to finish your website," " your a threat to what we built," " we have panties," "come," "want to sleep tonight," " no jews," " we hate christians," " your a jerk," "your the only one," "  hes a schitzophrenic," he hears voices in his head," " xfinity doesn't know," " the kids have everything covered," " xfinity is hacked too," " we steal everything you write, " " Andrew gets all your writing," " its for Mira ( local bribery and blackmail / hacker prostitutes ) at LuLu Carpenters, ( another UCSC hacker farm), "+its for David",( Chocolate another mex mafia controlled business on Pacific),( these businesses allow there emolyees to do the same thing, want feces in your coffee, how about    a worm in your pizza slice? )" David is building his own website," " he's stealing everything you do," " you can't prove it," " it how we make our money, he thinks its Ashly and it isnt, the police set it up, your the only one, its the only way you can be a local, your too smart, your moving, go back to Newport, its him or us, you got cheated, the police don't care, sue the owner, hes rich, its really the mexicans that own us, its a money laundry, the FBI knows, they dont care, they do it too, your dead, you cant talk about our people that way, your rude, your a racist, he hates our people, its our party,""""

This is what the employees say in real time as if they can see what I am working on on my computer. These are people who prepare peoples food in one of the busiest restaurants in Santa Cruz Calif. You have to think about that. They are the most corrupt, disrespectful, and cruel people I have ever met, its ridiculous what they get away with. The mexican members of the SCPD the SCFD and the paramedics eat here.

THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF STERLING STYLE COCA POT CARTEL MEDIA PROPAGANDA USED AS NEURO LINGUISTIC PROGRAMING AND A NEFARIOUS MANIPULATION

1/15/2016 Santa Cruz Ca.

Notes

This is a con article in the latest issue of the Magazine Inc.

Gender Issues In The Silicon Valley  Really Pretty Awful

The new report is jam packed with shocking statistics and horrifying anecdotes.

BY JESSICA STILLMAN

Contributor, Inc.com@EntryLevelRebel

( the staff of Pizza My Heart just said in real time as if they are monitoring what I'm writing " the police set that up," " its your last test, " and in walks the aggravating, Steve Posthuma voice imitator.

1. It is obviously an interesting article on an important subject related to the Silicon Valley business community.

2. It also functions as a Sterling/UCSC alumni style Neuro Linguistic Programming, victim harrassment, witness SPIN, social engineering, framing device. It is peppered with phraseology, statements from my stolen intelllectual property, copyrighted emails, and statements in public, and names of other people who share the same names of perpetrators responsible for too long a list of felony crimes against me and my family.

3. The article was delivered on the same day via google that I was severely harassed and threatened by evokers of the same people. The content of the article mocking the same kind of abuse  I just experienced in real time hidden by the use of a different context.

4. This is the devil in the details, friends of friends of the devil, in the media trying to stress and push a victim and witness over the edge. This is a trade mark con of the local newspapers, TV news, commercials, community cable even local NPR radio. One of the ultra left and ultra right of the Bay Areas coca/pot cartel secret weapons. The samples I kept for fifteen years in print and video clips all stolen from me last year.

5. Read the article it appears to be highly critical of the same people, its knot. ( spelling intentional).  By the way in Pizza My Heart as I am (shown) the article a dozen people setting around me take turns trying to SPIN me, stress me and anger me compounding the effects already created by the artice itself,  " were the jury,"

(("scumbstart,"  " death," " paranoid," " crazy," " me," realtime hack, inserted into the proof I am creating with this documentation) 

" she wrote it to help you," hell/ooo," your the one that sends out emails to everybody," you cant talk," now go home," " where are you now," "ha, ha, ha," " you know," " smart,"

6. All this abuse on top of being threatened again today with, disfigurement, disability, jail, hospitalization, psychiatric evaluation, framing for sex crimes, kidnapping and torture by the locals of Santa Cruz California in the Drug, Porno, Prostitution, Fraud, Forgery, Extortion, Racketeering, you name the felonies the locals of Santa Cruz.

Gender Issues In The Silicon Valley  Really Pretty Awful

The new report is jam packed with shocking statistics and horrifying anecdotes.

BY JESSICA STILLMAN

Contributor, Inc.com@EntryLevelRebel

There's certainly no shortage of awareness that Silicon Valley has a gender problem. A ((push for transparency in diversity)) data by big tech companies a couple of summers ago and the high-profile sexual harassment trial by ((Ellen)) Pao against VC firm Kleiner Perkins(( shone a bright spotlight)) on the issue of women's treatment in the industry.(( Has all the attention made a difference?))

If you look at(( flat)) diversity stats, the numbers say no. So does a new report entitled (("The Elephant in the Valley."))the report is a(( deep dive))into what it's really like to be a woman in tech. And it's pretty ugly.

((A parade of ugly statistics...))((Here are some of ((horrifying ))statistics this effort turned up:))

90 percent witnessed sexist behavior at company offsites and/or industry conferences.88 percent have had(( clients or colleagues address their male peers instead of them.))84 percent of respondents have been told they were ((too aggressive.))75 percent were(( asked about their family situation, ))including marital status and children,)) in interviews.66 percent(( felt excluded )) from networking)) opportunities because of their gender.60 percent reported(( being the target of unwanted sexual advances))from a superior)) 60 percent who(( reported sexual harassment were ((dissatisfied with the outcome.))47 percent have been asked to do ((lower-level tasks,)) like(( ordering food,) that men are not asked to. and(( uglier stories)).((But))while these numbers are pretty shocking,)) they might not be as terrible as some of the first person accounts of sexism)) included in the report. ((Here are a few:they told me 'this is just for the guys.'" she is irrelevant." 'how do we know you're not going to run off and have a baby?'"HR, I was retaliated against and had to leave the company."The authors are hoping that ignorance is behind some of the bad behavior highlighted in their report. "one has to wonder if more awareness alone is really going to make much difference.((Still, it's an intriguing project full of eye-popping information. It's also a collaborative effort,)) so other women who have had similar experiences can share their stories on the website.(( Or, )) ((Are you shocked by this report or is it pretty much old news to you?))((What Went Wrong After DailyCandy's $125 Million Sale/ Mark Cuban: The Next Big Thing /The Most Important Lesson From the Success of Steve/  How Marcus Lemonis/ Take a Ride in the First Airplane That Anyone Can Fly /Secrets of Wealth and Success/ From Tony Robbins How a 'Shark Tank' Host Got Scammed by His Own Sales Manager/ Arianna Huffington: The Wake-Up Call That Helped Arianna Huffington Learn to Thrive Make a Good Business Leader/ Barbara Corcoran's 8 Lessons 

SCHMSCHMSCHMSCHMS

SCHMSVHMSCHMSCHMS

and now this:

1.8.17 Silicon Valley Cali. ( as in coca/pot cartel) Just received an email from FORTUNE MAGAZINE. Here is the jest of it: Erin Griffith in Fortune (the very operation that employs me). She brings a sharp eye and an H.L. Mencken-esque dyspepsia that I find most salutary in this particular arena of coverage.

The title of her new feature, “The Ugly Unethical Underside of Silicon Valley,” couldn’t be more direct and the article makes its case with both hard evidence and writerly panache. It opens with a scene of venture capitalist Vinod Khosla—precisely the sort of idol that Mencken would’ve aimed his rapier at—contemptuously brushing aside a journalist named Jonathan Shieber who had the temerity to raise questions about one of Khosla’s investments. Damn sounds a little to much like me and my book in progress SODOM AND GOMORRAH IN AMERICA : The Power of the Underground Economy in NorCal Today.

Henry Louis Mencken (September 12, 1880 – January 29, 1956) was an American journalist, satirist, cultural critic and scholar of American English .....one of the most influential American writers and prose stylists of the first half of the twentieth century.

Mencken Quotes:

Truth would quickly cease to be stranger than fiction, once we got as used to it.”

― H.L. Mencken, A Little Book in C Major

“Conscience is the inner voice that warns us somebody may be looking.”

― H.L. Mencken, A Mencken

Dyspepsia: Indigestion. A condition characterized by upper abdominal symptoms that may include pain or discomfort, bloating, feeling of fullness with very little intake of food , feeling of unusual fullness following meals, nausea, loss of appetite, heartburn, regurgitation of food or acid, and belching.

SCHMSVHMSCHMSCHMS

and his trending news from Newsweek.....

The Donald Trump transition team is standing by conservative commentator Monica Crowley, who the president-elect has selected for an administration role, amid an investigation that claims she plagiarized much of her 2012 book, What the (Bleep) Just Happened.

CNN reports that she lifted portions of work done by other columnists, think tanks, news reporters and Wikipedia writers for inclusion in What the (Bleep) Just Happened with only minor alterations to the language.

SCHMSCHMSCHMSCHMS

FAKE NEWS POISONS YOUR MIND

"Pope Francis shocks world, endorses Donald Trump for president." “Clinton's assistant J. W. McGill is found dead.” “‘Tens of thousands’ of fraudulent Clinton votes found in Ohio warehouse.” These shocking news headlines of the past year all had one thing in common: They weren’t true. Not in the slightest. Each was manufactured, either out of malice or an attempt to cash in on advertising revenue, in an effort to deceive as many unwitting Internet readers as possible. They were, in other words, “fake news.”

Fake news, of course, is nothing new. In the past it took the form of pamphlets created to smear political enemies or sensationalist stories designed to “go viral” the old-fashioned way through newspaper sales. But the recent surge of false information enabled by our new social media landscapes has propelled it forward as a serious problem worthy of national and even international debate.

The problem, people say, is the medium. Which makes sense: Social media platforms like Facebook face criticism for enabling the spread of this kind of misleading or incorrect information, because they allow any user or even automated bots to post legitimate-looking articles, which then proceed to spread like wildfire through "liking" and "sharing." Now Facebook has rolled out new tools to crack down on fake viral articles, while Twitter is testing a new feature to let users flag misleading, false or harmful information.

But a new study published this week in the journal Nature Human Behaviour shows that the limitations of the human brain are also to blame. When people are overloaded with new information, they tend to rely on less-than-ideal coping mechanisms to distinguish good from bad, and end up privileging popularity over quality, the study suggests. It’s this lethal combination of data saturation and short, stretched attention spans that can enable fake news to spread so effectively.

"Through networks such as Twitter and Facebook, users are exposed daily to a large number of transmissible pieces of information that compete to attain success," says Diego Fregolente Mendes de Oliveira, a physicist at Northwestern University who studies how networks of people work and lead author of the study.

Because of the significant impacts that social media can have on politics and life, Oliveira says, discriminating between good and bad information has become "more important in today's online information networks than ever before." Yet even though the stakes are higher, the dynamics of like-minded groups such as those found on social media can undermine the collective judgment of those groups—making judgment calls about fake news even harder to make. As the study puts it, when given too much information, humans become “vulnerable to manipulation.”

In 2016, Oliveira set out to study how information spreads on social networks, and particularly how "low-quality information" or fake news can end up rippling out like a contagion. He designed a theoretical model to predict how fake news spreads on social networks.

The model did not incorporate actual human users or actual fake articles. But it did draw on data collected by independent observers about debunked (but nonetheless popular) Facebook and Twitter articles to calculate an average ratio of real news to fake news in posts flagged for review by users. Oliveira used this ratio to run an algorithm he designed on the sharing of news in a network.

This model was similar in design to a previous study in which Oliveira showed how people who segregate themselves into separate networks—the social bubbles of like-minded people one tends to create on Facebook, for example—can contribute to hoaxes and fake information spreading. As the thinking goes, these people are less likely to be exposed to information contrary to the posts their like-minded friends are sharing that could oust fake news and reveal the truth.

At relatively low flows of information, his algorithm predicted that a theoretical social media user was able to discriminate between genuine and fake news well, sharing mostly genuine news. However, as Oliveira and his coauthors tweaked the algorithm to reflect greater and greater flows of information—the equivalent of scrolling through an endless Twitter or Facebook feed—the theoretical user proved less and less capable of sorting quality information from bad information.

Oliveira found that, in general, popularity had a stronger effect on whether a person shared something than quality. At higher levels of information flow that effect became more pronounced, meaning people would theoretically spend less or no time assessing the information’s quality before deciding to share it. Soon, as they paid less and less attention to each piece of information, the people were sharing fake news at higher and higher rates.

At the highest rates modeled, the quality of a piece of information had zero effect on the popularity of that information. "We show that both information overload and limited attention contribute to a degradation in the system's discriminative power," Oliveira said via email.

While the model has clear limitations, it does provide one interpretation of how fake news spreads. "Traditionally it is believed that truth has some inherent power to overcome false," says Haluk Bingol, a computer engineer at Boğaziçi University in Turkey who has long studied online networks. "Similarly, the good eventually beats the bad. Social norms are based on these assumptions. Interestingly this has never been tested empirically."

Bingol, who was not involved in this study, says the study highlights how the quality the quality of information does not always win out when it comes to distribution. Oliveira’s research aligns with Bingol’s previous findings on the relationship choice and amount of information. In one paper, he found that the recommendation of a merchant advertising a certain item to a potential customer mattered even more strongly when the customer was presented with more options to choose from.

"That is, if you artificially increase the number of choices, you can obtain better results with the same 'marketing push,'" Bingol says. In other words, a person being overloaded with information is much more easy to manipulate—for advertisers, and for purveyors of fake news. "Clearly this is not difficult to do today," he adds.

Walter Quattrociocchi, a computer scientist at the IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca in Italy, is more skeptical of Oliveira's model. "Oversimplifying the complex social dynamics behind the emergence of narratives could be misleading," says Quattrociocchi, who was not involved in this research. For instance, the model used worked on the simplified assumption that social media users introduce new information at the same rate, and that users all start with the same attention spans.

While he found the study interesting, Quattrociocchi notes that other research has shown how confirmation bias and other factors beyond the scope of Oliveira's model can significantly affect the spread of information online.

For future research, Oliveira hopes to enhance his model with some of these other facts, including how a person's relationship to the sharer of information affects how they process it, and how likely people would be to change their minds upon receiving information online that conflicts with their current beliefs.

At the end of the day, Oliveira believes that stopping fake news starts with readers. He suggests that people read carefully what they share online, avoid unfriending or unfollowing people to create an online echo chamber, and avoid assuming anything is trustworthy even if they trust the person sharing it. "Keep in mind that our friends are probably not good editors and are driven by emotions and biases more than objectivity and trustworthiness," he points out.

So give this article another read, and check out where it came from before you click “share.”

Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-fake-news-breaks-your-brain-180963894/#F14MMVPpBiQO84q2.99

Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv

Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter